vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.9M vs $127.6M, roughly 1.1× JBG SMITH Properties). Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -30.3% vs -35.7%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -6.3%).
JBG SMITH PropertiesJBGSEarnings & Financial Report
JBG SMITH Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust based in Bethesda, Maryland.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
JBGS vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $127.6M | $142.9M |
| Net Profit | $-45.5M | $-43.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -35.7% | -30.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.5% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.0% | -44.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.76 | $-0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $127.6M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.9M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.5M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $130.8M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $143.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.2M | $144.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-45.5M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-28.6M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.2M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.7M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-59.9M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.0M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.4M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-32.3M | $-27.8M |
| Q4 25 | -47.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -53.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -30.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.7% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.2% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -37.9% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.8% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.2% | -19.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.76 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.70 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.32 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.36 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $75.3M | $731.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.3M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.0M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.5M | $138.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.5M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.3M | $140.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.3M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.4M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | $23.4M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JBGS
Segment breakdown not available.
PDM
| Atlanta GA | $45.7M | 32% |
| Dallas TX | $24.1M | 17% |
| Orlando FL | $19.3M | 13% |
| New York NY | $14.7M | 10% |
| Northern Virginia Washington D.C. | $12.9M | 9% |
| Minneapolis MN | $11.4M | 8% |
| Boston MA | $9.8M | 7% |
| Real Estate Other | $7.8M | 5% |
