vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.1M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.7× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -31.4%, a 31.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Genpact Ltd. is an American information technology services, consulting, and outsourcing company headquartered in New York City, New York. Founded in Gurgaon, India, and legally domiciled in Bermuda, Genpact employs more than 125,000 people and provides services to clients in over 30 countries worldwide. Genpact is listed on the NYSE and generated revenues of US$4.48 billion in 2023.
PDM vs REXR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $245.1M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $1.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 27.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | $245.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $253.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $249.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $242.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $241.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $237.6M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $82.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 34.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | $0.38 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $51.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $8.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $12.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $165.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $249.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $431.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $504.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $125.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $8.0B |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 0.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
