vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and WORKIVA INC (WK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WORKIVA INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($238.9M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.7× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). WORKIVA INC runs the higher net margin — 4.9% vs -31.4%, a 36.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORKIVA INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, WORKIVA INC's revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Workiva, Inc. is a global software-as-a-service (SaaS) company. It provides a cloud-based connected and reporting compliance platform that enables the use of connected data and automation of reporting across finance, accounting, risk, and compliance.
PDM vs WK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $238.9M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $11.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | 4.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | 234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $238.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $224.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $206.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $199.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $185.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 80.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 79.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 76.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 76.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.0% |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | -9.9% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $338.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $-5.4M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $338.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $315.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $301.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $248.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $267.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $-36.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-66.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $-75.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $-41.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $-50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $-77.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $51.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $50.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 21.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $138.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $46.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $50.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $-14.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-122.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
WK
| License And Service | $219.3M | 92% |
| XBRL Professional Services | $16.4M | 7% |
| Other Services | $3.2M | 1% |