vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP (WRLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $141.3M, roughly 1.0× WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP). WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP runs the higher net margin — -0.6% vs -31.4%, a 30.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.9% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.0% CAGR vs -5.8%).
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
Credit Acceptance Corporation is an auto finance company providing automobile loans and other related financial products. The company operates its financial program through a national network of dealer-partners, the automobile dealers participating in the programs. The company operates two programs: the "Portfolio Program" and the "Purchase Program". Through these programs, the company can advance money to automobile dealers in exchange for the right to service the underlying consumer loans a...
PDM vs WRLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.3M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | $-45.0M | $-911.3K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.7% |
| Net Margin | -31.4% | -0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | -106.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.10 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $143.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $142.9M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.2M | $134.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.3M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.7M | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.2M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $139.3M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-43.2M | $-911.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.1M | $44.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-30.0M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.8M | $9.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | -31.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -30.3% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.7% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.1% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.8% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | $8.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $2.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $3.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $1.79 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.3M | $10.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $677.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $351.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $731.0K | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.6M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.5M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $677.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $584.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $472.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $447.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $561.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $506.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $494.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $351.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $365.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $427.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $439.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $428.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $417.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $422.6M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.49× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.43× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.40× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.36× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.34× | 1.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $58.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 40.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 110.3% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $412.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.8M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7M | $254.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | $53.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.8M | $48.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $47.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $250.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 151.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | 110.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
