vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and STONERIDGE INC (SRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STONERIDGE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.2M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.1× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Stoneridge Inc is a global designer and manufacturer of advanced electrical and electronic components, integrated systems, and sensor solutions. It serves automotive, commercial vehicle, off-highway, and aerospace sectors, delivering products that boost vehicle safety, efficiency, connectivity, and environmental performance across key global markets.
PECO vs SRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $205.2M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.2% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-2.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $205.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $218.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $213.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $237.1M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.7% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $-2.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $66.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $180.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $179.8M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $551.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.01× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $66.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $54.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $71.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $42.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $180.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $201.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $179.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $260.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $253.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $271.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $270.5M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $632.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $639.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $657.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $621.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $662.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $666.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $8.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $12.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $8.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 3.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
SRI
| Control Devices | $51.7M | 25% |
| Electronics | $38.0M | 19% |
| EE | $34.2M | 17% |
| SE | $28.6M | 14% |
| NL | $24.5M | 12% |
| Stoneridge Brazil | $14.1M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific | $13.1M | 6% |
