vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.7× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs -16.4%, a 33.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
PECO vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $347.6M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $4.2M |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $192.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $973.1M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 1.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $-33.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-38.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | -7.98× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |