vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and VERRA MOBILITY Corp (VRRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VERRA MOBILITY Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($257.9M vs $190.7M, roughly 1.4× Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.4% vs 7.3%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VERRA MOBILITY Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.4% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, VERRA MOBILITY Corp's revenue compounded faster (10.9% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Verra Mobility Corp is a leading global smart mobility technology solution provider. It delivers toll management, parking and traffic compliance enforcement, connected vehicle services, and fleet management tools, serving government transport agencies, rental car operators, commercial fleet owners, and automotive partners across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
PECO vs VRRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $257.9M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | $18.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | 128.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $257.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $261.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $223.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $221.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $222.4M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $18.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | $-66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $34.2M |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.5% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | -30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $65.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $293.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $65.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $147.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $108.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $77.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $206.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $122.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $293.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $352.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $299.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $265.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $486.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $438.6M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | 3.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | 3.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 3.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 2.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $40.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $5.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 13.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | 2.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $136.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $75.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $63.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $40.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $85.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | 2.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | 1.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | 1.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
VRRM
| Services | $239.5M | 93% |
| CA | $8.4M | 3% |
| GB | $5.7M | 2% |
| Other Customer | $1.6M | 1% |
| Parking Solutions | $1.1M | 0% |
