vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and Zai Lab Ltd (ZLAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($190.7M vs $127.1M, roughly 1.5× Zai Lab Ltd). On growth, Zai Lab Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.1% vs 7.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Zai Lab Ltd's revenue compounded faster (20.8% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Consolidated Edison, Inc., commonly known as Con Edison or ConEd, is an energy company based in New York City. It is one of the largest investor-owned energy companies in the United States, with approximately $15.26 billion in annual revenues as of 2024, and over $70 billion in assets. The company provides a wide range of energy-related products and services to its customers through its subsidiaries:Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY), a regulated utility providing electric...
Zai Lab Ltd is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing and commercializing innovative therapies for oncology, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases and other unmet medical needs. It operates primarily in the Greater China region and partners with leading global biotech firms to expand access to life-saving treatments for underserved patient populations.
PECO vs ZLAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $190.7M | $127.1M |
| Net Profit | $33.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | -54.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 17.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $187.9M | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | $115.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.8M | $109.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $105.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.0M | $108.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $101.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | $100.1M |
| Q1 26 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.7M | $-36.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $-40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-48.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6M | $-41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $-80.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 51.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 61.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 64.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 64.9% |
| Q1 26 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -50.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -62.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -66.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -76.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | -31.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | -37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | -40.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | -80.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1M | $689.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $715.5M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $689.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $717.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $732.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $757.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $779.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.1M | $630.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $715.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $759.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $791.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $810.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $840.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $667.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $704.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $985.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $987.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.6M | $-26.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-26.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -21.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-158.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.1M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.4M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.1M | $-31.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.5M | $-61.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $334.7M | $-55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $109.1M | $-26.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $-42.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-63.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-58.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-42.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -31.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -59.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -53.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -42.9% |
| Q1 26 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.30× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.40× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PECO
| Rental income | $186.3M | 98% |
| Fees and management income | $3.4M | 2% |
ZLAB
| Zejula | $56.0M | 44% |
| Other | $21.9M | 17% |
| Nuzyra | $16.0M | 13% |
| Optune | $11.9M | 9% |
| XACDURO | $10.7M | 8% |
| Qinlock | $9.7M | 8% |
| AUGTYRO | $836.0K | 1% |
