vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA) and RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC (RLGT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEGASYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($430.0M vs $232.1M, roughly 1.9× RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC). PEGASYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 2.3%, a 5.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEGASYSTEMS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.6% vs -12.3%). PEGASYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($206.5M vs $11.6M). Over the past eight quarters, RADIANT LOGISTICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs 10.7%).
Pegasystems Inc. (Pega) is a global software company based in Waltham, Massachusetts, in the United States, and founded in 1983. The company has been publicly traded since 1996 as PEGA (NASDAQ). Pega is a low-code platform for workflow automation and generative AI-powered decision-making for businesses.
Radiant Logistics, Inc. is a leading third-party logistics provider offering end-to-end supply chain solutions, domestic and international freight forwarding, warehousing, and last-mile delivery services. It primarily serves North American markets, with key client segments including retail, manufacturing, e-commerce, and industrial sectors, helping businesses optimize logistics workflows and cut operational costs.
PEGA vs RLGT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $430.0M | $232.1M |
| Net Profit | $32.8M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 75.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.6% | -12.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -61.6% | -18.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $430.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $504.3M | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $381.4M | $226.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.5M | $220.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | $214.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $490.8M | $264.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $325.1M | $203.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $351.2M | $206.0M |
| Q1 26 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $234.6M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $4.8M |
| Q1 26 | 75.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 79.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 72.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 78.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 79.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.81 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.24 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.91 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.35 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.07 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $270.0M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $705.9M | $229.8M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $439.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $270.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $425.8M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $351.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.6M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.0M | $19.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $703.0M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $665.1M | $24.9M |
| Q1 26 | $705.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $787.4M | $229.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $596.8M | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $624.5M | $226.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $611.3M | $218.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $585.5M | $214.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $473.0M | $212.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $435.4M | $209.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $439.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $445.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $426.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $414.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $386.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $375.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $371.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $12.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $206.5M | $11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 48.0% | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $494.9M | $8.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $158.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $204.2M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.2M | $15.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.5M | $205.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | $206.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $152.4M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.8M | $977.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.3M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.4M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.4M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.8M | $-185.0K |
| Q1 26 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.2% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.5% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | -0.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | 2.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.87× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.39× | -2.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.80× | 2.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.06× | 0.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PEGA
| Pega Cloud | $205.0M | 48% |
| Subscription license | $94.9M | 22% |
| Maintenance | $75.3M | 18% |
| Consulting | $54.8M | 13% |
RLGT
| Transferred Over Time | $201.2M | 87% |
| Other | $25.0M | 11% |
| Value Added Services | $4.2M | 2% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.8M | 1% |
