vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PepsiCo (PEP) and Texas Instruments (TXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PepsiCo is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($19.4B vs $4.8B, roughly 4.0× Texas Instruments). Texas Instruments runs the higher net margin — 32.0% vs 12.0%, a 20.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Texas Instruments posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.6% vs 8.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Instruments's revenue compounded faster (12.4% CAGR vs -7.0%).

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American multinational food and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products. PepsiCo was formed in 1965 with the merger of the Pepsi-Cola Company and Frito-Lay, Inc., PepsiCo has since expanded from its namesake product Pepsi to an immensely diversified range of food and beverage brands.

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TI) is an American multinational semiconductor company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is one of the top 10 semiconductor companies worldwide based on sales volume. The company's focus is on developing analog chips and embedded processors, which account for more than 80% of its revenue. TI also produces digital light processing (DLP) technology and education technology products including calculators, microcontrollers, and multi-core processors.

PEP vs TXN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PEP
PEP
4.0× larger
PEP
$19.4B
$4.8B
TXN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TXN
TXN
+10.1% gap
TXN
18.6%
8.5%
PEP
Higher net margin
TXN
TXN
20.0% more per $
TXN
32.0%
12.0%
PEP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TXN
TXN
Annualised
TXN
12.4%
-7.0%
PEP

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Revenue
$19.4B
$4.8B
Net Profit
$2.3B
$1.5B
Gross Margin
55.2%
58.0%
Operating Margin
16.5%
37.5%
Net Margin
12.0%
32.0%
Revenue YoY
8.5%
18.6%
Net Profit YoY
31.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.68

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$19.4B
$4.8B
Q4 25
$29.3B
$4.4B
Q3 25
$23.9B
$4.7B
Q2 25
$22.7B
$4.4B
Q1 25
$17.9B
$4.1B
Q4 24
$27.8B
$4.0B
Q3 24
$23.3B
$4.2B
Q2 24
$22.5B
$3.8B
Net Profit
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$2.3B
$1.5B
Q4 25
$2.5B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.8B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$1.4B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$1.1B
Gross Margin
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
55.2%
58.0%
Q4 25
53.2%
55.9%
Q3 25
53.6%
57.4%
Q2 25
54.7%
57.9%
Q1 25
55.8%
56.8%
Q4 24
52.6%
57.7%
Q3 24
55.4%
59.6%
Q2 24
55.9%
57.8%
Operating Margin
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
16.5%
37.5%
Q4 25
12.1%
33.3%
Q3 25
14.9%
35.1%
Q2 25
7.9%
35.1%
Q1 25
14.4%
32.5%
Q4 24
8.1%
34.4%
Q3 24
16.6%
37.4%
Q2 24
18.0%
32.7%
Net Margin
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
12.0%
32.0%
Q4 25
8.7%
26.3%
Q3 25
10.9%
28.8%
Q2 25
5.6%
29.1%
Q1 25
10.2%
29.0%
Q4 24
5.5%
30.1%
Q3 24
12.6%
32.8%
Q2 24
13.7%
29.5%
EPS (diluted)
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$1.68
Q4 25
$1.85
$1.28
Q3 25
$1.90
$1.48
Q2 25
$0.92
$1.41
Q1 25
$1.33
$1.28
Q4 24
$1.11
$1.31
Q3 24
$2.13
$1.47
Q2 24
$2.23
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$10.8B
$5.1B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$14.1B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$21.5B
$16.8B
Total Assets
$110.6B
$34.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.84×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$10.8B
$5.1B
Q4 25
$9.5B
$4.9B
Q3 25
$8.7B
$5.2B
Q2 25
$8.0B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$8.6B
$5.0B
Q4 24
$9.3B
$7.6B
Q3 24
$8.1B
$8.8B
Q2 24
$6.7B
$9.7B
Total Debt
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$14.1B
Q4 25
$42.3B
$14.0B
Q3 25
$44.1B
$14.0B
Q2 25
$39.3B
$14.0B
Q1 25
$39.4B
$12.8B
Q4 24
$37.2B
$13.6B
Q3 24
$38.5B
$13.9B
Q2 24
$36.6B
$13.9B
Stockholders' Equity
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$21.5B
$16.8B
Q4 25
$20.4B
$16.3B
Q3 25
$19.4B
$16.6B
Q2 25
$18.4B
$16.4B
Q1 25
$18.4B
$16.4B
Q4 24
$18.0B
$16.9B
Q3 24
$19.5B
$17.3B
Q2 24
$19.4B
$17.2B
Total Assets
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$110.6B
$34.4B
Q4 25
$107.4B
$34.6B
Q3 25
$106.6B
$35.0B
Q2 25
$105.3B
$34.9B
Q1 25
$101.7B
$33.8B
Q4 24
$99.5B
$35.5B
Q3 24
$100.5B
$35.3B
Q2 24
$99.5B
$35.0B
Debt / Equity
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
0.84×
Q4 25
2.07×
0.86×
Q3 25
2.28×
0.84×
Q2 25
2.14×
0.86×
Q1 25
2.14×
0.78×
Q4 24
2.06×
0.80×
Q3 24
1.98×
0.80×
Q2 24
1.88×
0.81×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.4B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
29.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
14.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$4.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$6.6B
$2.3B
Q3 25
$4.5B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$2.0B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$-973.0M
$849.0M
Q4 24
$6.3B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$4.9B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$1.6B
Free Cash Flow
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
$1.4B
Q4 25
$4.7B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$993.0M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$555.0M
Q1 25
$-1.6B
$-274.0M
Q4 24
$3.8B
$806.0M
Q3 24
$3.8B
$416.0M
Q2 24
$1.3B
$507.0M
FCF Margin
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
29.0%
Q4 25
16.0%
30.0%
Q3 25
14.5%
20.9%
Q2 25
4.7%
12.5%
Q1 25
-8.8%
-6.7%
Q4 24
13.7%
20.1%
Q3 24
16.1%
10.0%
Q2 24
5.6%
13.3%
Capex Intensity
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
14.0%
Q4 25
6.5%
20.9%
Q3 25
4.1%
25.2%
Q2 25
4.0%
29.3%
Q1 25
3.4%
27.6%
Q4 24
8.9%
29.7%
Q3 24
4.9%
31.7%
Q2 24
4.8%
27.8%
Cash Conversion
PEP
PEP
TXN
TXN
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.61×
1.94×
Q3 25
1.72×
1.61×
Q2 25
1.56×
1.44×
Q1 25
-0.53×
0.72×
Q4 24
4.13×
1.66×
Q3 24
1.67×
1.27×
Q2 24
0.76×
1.39×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons