vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) and ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($159.0M vs $120.3M, roughly 1.3× Phreesia, Inc.). ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 52.2% vs 3.5%, a 48.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Phreesia, Inc. is a software as a service company that offers healthcare organizations a set of applications to automate and manage patient intake.
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company operating full-service banking locations primarily across the Southeastern United States. It offers a full suite of commercial banking, consumer banking, wealth management, and mortgage lending services to small and medium-sized businesses, professional clients, and individual consumers.
PHR vs SFBS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.3M | $159.0M |
| Net Profit | $4.3M | $83.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 3.5% | 52.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 129.7% | 31.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $1.52 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $159.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.3M | $162.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.3M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $132.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $131.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $123.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $114.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $654.0K | $65.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.9M | $61.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $63.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $65.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 66.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.3% | 57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 58.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 58.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 59.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.4% | 46.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.52 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | $1.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.4M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $320.3M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $423.5M | $18.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $106.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $320.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $298.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $423.5M | $17.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.6M | $17.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $400.4M | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | $355.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $67.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $252.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.62× | 4.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.68× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PHR
| Subscription And Services | $55.5M | 46% |
| Network Solutions | $37.4M | 31% |
| Payment Processing Fees | $27.4M | 23% |
SFBS
| Net Interest Income | $148.1M | 93% |
| Noninterest Income | $10.8M | 7% |
