vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Packaging Corporation of America (PKG) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Vertiv Holdings Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.1× Packaging Corporation of America). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 7.2%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs 6.8%).

Packaging Corporation of America is an American manufacturing company based in Lake Forest, Illinois. The company has about 15,500 employees, with operations primarily in the United States. The CEO is Mark W. Kowlzan.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

PKG vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
VRT
VRT
1.1× larger
VRT
$2.6B
$2.4B
PKG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+19.5% gap
VRT
30.1%
10.6%
PKG
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
7.5% more per $
VRT
14.7%
7.2%
PKG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRT
VRT
Annualised
VRT
16.5%
6.8%
PKG

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$2.4B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$170.9M
$390.1M
Gross Margin
19.1%
37.7%
Operating Margin
10.6%
Net Margin
7.2%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
10.6%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
-16.1%
137.1%
EPS (diluted)
$1.91
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.4B
$2.6B
Q4 25
$2.4B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$2.2B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$2.1B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$2.1B
$2.0B
Net Profit
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$170.9M
$390.1M
Q4 25
$101.9M
$445.6M
Q3 25
$226.9M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$241.5M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$203.8M
$164.5M
Q4 24
$221.2M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$238.1M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$198.9M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
19.1%
37.7%
Q4 25
18.9%
38.9%
Q3 25
21.8%
37.8%
Q2 25
22.2%
34.0%
Q1 25
21.2%
33.7%
Q4 24
21.9%
37.1%
Q3 24
23.1%
36.5%
Q2 24
21.1%
38.0%
Operating Margin
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
10.6%
Q4 25
7.1%
20.1%
Q3 25
14.0%
19.3%
Q2 25
15.4%
16.8%
Q1 25
13.1%
14.3%
Q4 24
14.1%
19.5%
Q3 24
15.0%
17.9%
Q2 24
13.3%
17.2%
Net Margin
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
7.2%
14.7%
Q4 25
4.3%
15.5%
Q3 25
9.8%
14.9%
Q2 25
11.1%
12.3%
Q1 25
9.5%
8.1%
Q4 24
10.3%
6.3%
Q3 24
10.9%
8.5%
Q2 24
9.6%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$1.91
$0.99
Q4 25
$1.14
$1.14
Q3 25
$2.51
$1.02
Q2 25
$2.67
$0.83
Q1 25
$2.26
$0.42
Q4 24
$2.45
$0.38
Q3 24
$2.64
$0.46
Q2 24
$2.21
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.2B
Total Assets
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.5B
Q4 25
$529.0M
$1.7B
Q3 25
$634.0M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$787.9M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$751.7M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$685.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$676.6M
$908.7M
Q2 24
$613.6M
$579.7M
Total Debt
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$4.0B
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.0B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$2.9B
Q1 25
$2.9B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$4.2B
Q4 25
$4.6B
$3.9B
Q3 25
$4.8B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$4.6B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$4.5B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$4.4B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$4.3B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$4.1B
$1.5B
Total Assets
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$13.4B
Q4 25
$10.7B
$12.2B
Q3 25
$11.0B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$9.0B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$9.0B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$8.8B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$8.8B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$9.0B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.87×
0.74×
Q3 25
0.84×
0.83×
Q2 25
0.93×
Q1 25
1.10×
Q4 24
0.57×
1.20×
Q3 24
0.58×
1.62×
Q2 24
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$446.6M
$978.9M
Q3 25
$472.2M
$508.7M
Q2 25
$299.6M
$322.9M
Q1 25
$339.1M
$303.3M
Q4 24
$325.4M
$425.2M
Q3 24
$327.1M
$378.2M
Q2 24
$278.3M
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$652.8M
Q4 25
$127.6M
$885.6M
Q3 25
$280.1M
$463.5M
Q2 25
$129.9M
$277.9M
Q1 25
$191.0M
$266.8M
Q4 24
$124.1M
$364.5M
Q3 24
$180.4M
$341.8M
Q2 24
$33.3M
$344.3M
FCF Margin
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
24.6%
Q4 25
5.4%
30.8%
Q3 25
12.1%
17.3%
Q2 25
6.0%
10.5%
Q1 25
8.9%
13.1%
Q4 24
5.8%
15.5%
Q3 24
8.3%
16.5%
Q2 24
1.6%
17.6%
Capex Intensity
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
4.2%
Q4 25
13.5%
3.2%
Q3 25
8.3%
1.7%
Q2 25
7.8%
1.7%
Q1 25
6.9%
1.8%
Q4 24
9.4%
2.6%
Q3 24
6.7%
1.8%
Q2 24
11.8%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
PKG
PKG
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.38×
2.20×
Q3 25
2.08×
1.28×
Q2 25
1.24×
1.00×
Q1 25
1.66×
1.84×
Q4 24
1.47×
2.89×
Q3 24
1.37×
2.14×
Q2 24
1.40×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons