vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHOTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.4M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.3× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 10.9%, a 14.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -5.5%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $25.2M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
PLAB vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.4M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.4% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.4M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.1M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.0M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.3M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.9M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.4M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.6% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.54 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.8M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $575.8M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.4M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.2M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.7M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.4M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.9M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $521.5M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $9.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.2M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.0% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.8% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.5M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.5M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.1M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.19× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.55× | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.59× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
