vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHOTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.4M vs $109.4M, roughly 1.9× TRICO BANCSHARES ). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs 10.9%, a 240.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRICO BANCSHARES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.0% vs -5.5%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $25.2M). Over the past eight quarters, TRICO BANCSHARES 's revenue compounded faster (5.4% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
PLAB vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.4M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.4% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.4M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.1M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.0M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.3M | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.4M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.6% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.54 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.8M | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $575.8M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.4M | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.2M | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.7M | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.4M | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.9M | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $521.5M | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $9.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.2M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.0% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.8% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.5M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.5M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.1M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.19× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.55× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.59× | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
TCBK
Segment breakdown not available.
