vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB) and TRUSTMARK CORP (TRMK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHOTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.4M vs $204.1M, roughly 1.0× TRUSTMARK CORP). TRUSTMARK CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs 10.9%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TRUSTMARK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs -5.5%). TRUSTMARK CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($232.0M vs $25.2M). Over the past eight quarters, TRUSTMARK CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
Trustmark is an insurance company. According to Crain's Chicago Business magazine, Trustmark ranks #69 among Chicago's Largest Privately Held Companies in 2018.
PLAB vs TRMK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.4M | $204.1M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $57.9M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 34.7% |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.4% | 2.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $204.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.4M | $202.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $198.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.1M | $194.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.0M | $192.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $141.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.3M | $172.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $57.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | $55.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $53.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.9M | $56.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.4M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.2M | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | 32.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | -98.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.6% | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 28.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 36.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.1% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.54 | $0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.42 | $0.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $18.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $575.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $521.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $18.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $18.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $18.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | $243.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.2M | $232.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.0% | 113.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.8% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.5M | $409.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $243.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $116.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | $59.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.5M | $-58.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $232.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2M | $62.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.1M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $80.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $93.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $51.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-63.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | 41.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | -36.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.19× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.55× | 0.67× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 2.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.59× | -1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
TRMK
Segment breakdown not available.
