vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PHOTRONICS INC (PLAB) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PHOTRONICS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($210.4M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.6× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 10.9%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs -5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs -3.8%).
Photronics, Inc. is an American semiconductor photomask manufacturer. It was the third largest photomask supplier globally as of 2009. Photronics is a member of the eBeam Initiative.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
PLAB vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $210.4M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 33.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 10.9% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.4% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.4M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $211.0M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $212.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $222.6M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.0M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $217.0M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.9M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.9M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.4M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.4% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.1% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.7% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.39 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.15 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.54 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.8M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $16.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $575.8M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $558.4M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $642.2M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.7M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.4M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.9M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $25.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.8% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $64.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.1M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $78.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.4M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.1M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.2M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.5M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.0% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.8% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.19× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.55× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLAB
| High End Integrated Circuits | $53.6M | 25% |
| High End Flat Panel Displays | $53.5M | 25% |
| KR | $43.7M | 21% |
| Other | $42.1M | 20% |
| Mainstream Flat Panel Displays | $9.1M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 4% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
