vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) and Proto Labs Inc (PRLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($253.4M vs $136.5M, roughly 1.9× Proto Labs Inc). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 12.1%). Palomar Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($409.0M vs $8.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
Protolabs is a company that provides rapid manufacturing of 3D printed, CNC-machined, sheet metal, and injection-molded custom parts for prototyping and production. Markets like medical devices, aerospace, electronics, appliances, automotive and consumer products use these parts. Protolabs' headquarters are located in Maple Plain, Minnesota, with Minnesota-based manufacturing facilities in Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, and Rosemount, along with additional facilities in Nashua, New Hampshire and Ca...
PLMR vs PRLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $253.4M | $136.5M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 28.7% | 5.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | 62.7% | 12.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.05 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $136.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $244.7M | $135.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $203.3M | $135.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.6M | $126.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $155.8M | $121.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.5M | $125.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $131.1M | $125.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.5M | $127.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.9% |
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.0% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.05 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.87 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.68 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.57 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.29 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.00 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.04 | $0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $106.9M | $128.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $942.7M | $673.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $763.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $106.9M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.7M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.3M | $103.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.3M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.4M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.5M | $100.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.8M | $112.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | $109.7M |
| Q4 25 | $942.7M | $673.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $878.1M | $664.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $847.2M | $664.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $790.4M | $656.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $729.0M | $670.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $703.3M | $680.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $532.6M | $685.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $501.7M | $687.3M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $763.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $756.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | $743.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | $737.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $743.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $753.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $758.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $769.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $409.1M | $16.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $409.0M | $8.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 161.4% | 6.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $700.6M | $59.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $409.1M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.3M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $21.3M |
| Q4 25 | $409.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.6M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $87.1M | $17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $100.1M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.8M |
| Q4 25 | 161.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 167.5% | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.4% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 2.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.60× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.03× | 5.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.29× | 3.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 3.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | 4.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.
PRLB
| CNC Machining Firstcut | $65.5M | 48% |
| Injection Molding Protomold | $47.6M | 35% |
| Three D Printing Fineline | $18.8M | 14% |
| Sheet Metal | $4.4M | 3% |
