vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW) and TRICO BANCSHARES (TCBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $109.4M, roughly 1.7× TRICO BANCSHARES ). TRICO BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 251.6% vs 7.0%, a 244.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 9.0%). TRICO BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($127.9M vs $92.8M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 5.4%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
Trico Bancshares is a U.S.-headquartered regional bank holding company operating Tri Counties Bank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services including deposit products, mortgages, small business loans, and wealth management, primarily serving consumers and SMEs in Northern California.
PLOW vs TCBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $109.4M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $33.6M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 42.6% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 251.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.3% | 15.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $1.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.5M | $109.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $107.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.3M | $103.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.1M | $98.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $100.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.4M | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.9M | $97.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.7M | $98.5M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $27.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0K | $26.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $29.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $27.7M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 35.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 39.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | 38.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 251.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 221.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.09 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.36 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $157.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $144.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $281.4M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $626.7M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $314.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $308.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $320.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $206.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $82.8M |
| Q4 25 | $144.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $281.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $626.7M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.9M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $671.5M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.0M | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.6M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.1M | $9.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.9M | $133.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.8M | $127.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 50.3% | 116.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 4.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.47× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.6M | $222.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.9M | $133.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.5M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $109.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.2M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $31.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.6M | $25.1M |
| Q4 25 | $92.8M | $127.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $43.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $105.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0K | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.4M | $24.1M |
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | 116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | 24.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.47× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.44× | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.03× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.41× | 3.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.44× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.90× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
TCBK
Segment breakdown not available.
