vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.9× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). INTERFACE INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 7.0%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 4.3%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $28.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 9.8%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
PLOW vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.3% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.5M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.3M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.1M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.4M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.9M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.7M | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.09 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.36 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $144.0M | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $281.4M | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $626.7M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | $144.0M | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $281.4M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.3M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.3M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.2M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.7M | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $626.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $671.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.1M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.9M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.8M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 50.3% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.47× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.6M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.9M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.5M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.2M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.6M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $92.8M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0K | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.4M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 7.47× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.44× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.03× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.41× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.44× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |
