vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.4× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 7.0%, a 10.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 11.6%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
PLOW vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.3% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.5M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.3M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.4M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.9M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0K | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.09 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.36 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $144.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $281.4M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $626.7M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $144.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.7M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $626.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $671.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.6M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.9M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 50.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.47× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.9M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.5M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.2M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $92.8M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0K | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.47× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.44× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.03× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.41× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.44× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
