vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $184.5M, roughly 1.2× DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs 5.8%, a 1.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.6% vs 9.6%). DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($92.8M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 9.5%).
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
PLOW vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $184.5M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.5% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.6% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 62.3% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $184.5M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.1M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.3M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.5M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.4M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.9M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.7M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0K | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-8.4M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -6.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.7% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.09 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.36 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.37 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $144.0M | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $281.4M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $626.7M | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.51× | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | $144.0M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.5M | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $281.4M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.3M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $273.3M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $258.9M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $264.2M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.7M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $217.2M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $626.7M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $694.9M | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $671.5M | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.0M | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.0M | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $665.6M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $577.1M | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.51× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.56× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $95.9M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $92.8M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 50.3% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.47× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $63.6M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $95.9M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.5M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.4M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.2M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.6M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $92.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.4M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.5M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.4M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 50.3% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.1% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.8% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.4% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.47× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.07× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.44× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.03× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.41× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.44× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.10× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
