vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Palantir Technologies (PLTR) and U-Haul Holding Co (UHAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
U-Haul Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.0× Palantir Technologies). Palantir Technologies runs the higher net margin — 43.3% vs 2.6%, a 40.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Palantir Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (70.0% vs 1.9%). Palantir Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($764.0M vs $-447.6M).
Palantir Technologies Inc. is an American publicly traded company that develops data integration and analytics platforms enabling government agencies, militaries, and corporations to combine and analyze data from multiple sources. Its flagship products—Gotham and Foundry —connect previously siloed databases to support intelligence operations, counterterrorism analysis, law enforcement, and enterprise analytics.
U-Haul Holding Company is an American moving truck, trailer, and self-storage rental company, based in Phoenix, Arizona that has been in operation since 1945. The company was founded by Leonard Shoen and Anna Mary Carty in Ridgefield, Washington who began it in a garage owned by Carty's family, and expanded it through franchising with gas stations. U-Haul has been known to rent to 50 states of the U.S. and the 10 Canadian Provinces.
PLTR vs UHAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $608.7M | $37.0M |
| Gross Margin | 84.6% | 96.4% |
| Operating Margin | 40.9% | 2.4% |
| Net Margin | 43.3% | 2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 70.0% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 670.4% | -45.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $232.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $883.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $827.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $725.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $678.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $634.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $608.7M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.6M | $105.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $326.7M | $142.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 84.6% | 96.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.4% | 96.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 80.8% | 68.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 80.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 79.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.3% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.6% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.04 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $7.7B |
| Total Assets | $8.9B | $21.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $877.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $21.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.1B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.4B | $20.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $777.3M | $240.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $764.0M | $-447.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 54.3% | -31.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 48.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.28× | 6.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $777.3M | $240.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $507.7M | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.3M | $598.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $764.0M | $-447.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.9M | $-446.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $531.6M | $-318.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $304.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $457.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $415.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $126.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 54.3% | -31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.4% | -25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.0% | -137.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 57.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 395.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.28× | 6.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 5.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.65× | 4.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLTR
| Geographic Concentration Risk | $1.1B | 77% |
| Other | $330.4M | 23% |
UHAL
| Long Term Contract With Customer | $1.2B | 82% |
| CA | $74.0M | 5% |
| Life Insurance | $56.2M | 4% |
| Accident And Health Insurance Segment | $49.8M | 4% |
| Investments Segment | $47.3M | 3% |
| Property And Casualty Insurance | $42.5M | 3% |
| Mercury | $1.6M | 0% |
