vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and PERRIGO Co plc (PRGO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× PERRIGO Co plc). PLEXUS CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs -127.8%, a 132.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 1.3%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
Perrigo Company plc is an American Irish-registered manufacturer of private label over-the-counter pharmaceuticals, and while 70% of Perrigo's net sales are from the U.S. healthcare system, Perrigo is legally headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes, which accounts for 0.60% of net sales. In 2013, Perrigo completed the sixth-largest US corporate tax inversion in history when it reregistered its tax status to Ireland to avoid U.S. corporate taxes. Perrigo maintains its corporate headquarters ...
PLXS vs PRGO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $49.8M | $-1.4B |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | -116.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | -127.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.5% | -3093.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.82 | $-10.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-108.4M |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -127.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.79 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $303.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $432.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $454.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $409.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $558.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $542.8M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $175.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $148.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $145.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $75.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $312.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $148.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-90.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $274.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-18.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
PRGO
| Consumer Self Care Americas | $697.0M | 63% |
| Digestive Health | $123.9M | 11% |
| Nutrition | $108.3M | 10% |
| Healthy Lifestyle | $94.8M | 9% |
| Pain And Sleep Aids | $87.1M | 8% |