vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and SCANSOURCE, INC. (SCSC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $766.5M, roughly 1.4× SCANSOURCE, INC.). PLEXUS CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.8% vs 2.2%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 0.9%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
ScanSource, Inc. is a leading global specialty technology distributor offering a broad portfolio of solutions including point-of-sale systems, barcode scanning tools, cybersecurity products, cloud services and communication solutions. It primarily serves value-added resellers, managed service providers and enterprise clients across North America, Latin America and Europe, covering retail, healthcare, industrial and public sector core segments.
PLXS vs SCSC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $766.5M |
| Net Profit | $41.2M | $16.5M |
| Gross Margin | 9.9% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | 3.8% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.6% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.9% | -3.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $766.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $739.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $812.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $704.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $747.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $775.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $746.1M |
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.1M |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $248.8M | $83.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $910.9M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $124.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $126.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $146.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $110.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $185.5M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $910.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $914.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $906.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $901.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $920.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $924.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $30.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $28.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.87× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $66.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $612.0M | 57% |
| Americas | $345.0M | 32% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $118.0M | 11% |
SCSC
| Products And Services | $723.4M | 94% |
| Intelisys Advisory | $25.0M | 3% |
| Recurring Revenue | $18.2M | 2% |