vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PLEXUS CORP (PLXS) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.6× PLEXUS CORP). Williams-Sonoma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 4.3%, a 8.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 4.6%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -9.1%).
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
Williams Sonoma is an American retailer of cookware, appliances, and home furnishings. It is owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and was founded by Charles E. (Chuck) Williams in 1956.
PLXS vs WSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $49.8M | $241.6M |
| Gross Margin | 10.2% | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.5% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.82 | $1.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $241.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $384.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $249.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $265.7M |
| Q1 26 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $303.1M | $884.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $248.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $884.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $985.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $826.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $316.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $248.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $316.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $282.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $118.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $633.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $253.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $246.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $226.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $230.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $566.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $170.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $215.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $187.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
WSM
Segment breakdown not available.
