vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and SolarMax Technology, Inc. (SMXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $46.6M, roughly 1.1× SolarMax Technology, Inc.). SolarMax Technology, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -106.3%, a 104.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SolarMax Technology, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (623.5% vs -1.4%).
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
SolarMax Technology, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-efficiency solar PV modules and clean energy systems. It serves residential, commercial and industrial clients in North America and key Asia-Pacific markets, offering installation and after-sales support to boost low-carbon energy use.
PLYM vs SMXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.2M | $46.6M |
| Net Profit | $-54.4M | $-872.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 2.7% |
| Operating Margin | -102.5% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | -106.3% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | 623.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -248.5% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $46.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.6M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-872.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-54.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -102.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.3% | -25.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | -158.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.3% | -7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | -27.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 309.9% | -60.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.1% | -152.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.24 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.1M | $-12.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $91.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.1M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.6M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.0M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.5M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.5M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $38.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $38.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $220.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $-601.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $203.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PLYM
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT
| Yabucoa | $35.9M | 77% |
| Other | $10.7M | 23% |
