vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and TOP SHIPS INC. (TOPS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.2M vs $36.6M, roughly 1.4× TOP SHIPS INC.). TOP SHIPS INC. runs the higher net margin — -12.2% vs -106.3%, a 94.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.

Top Ships Inc. is a supply chain maritime transportation operations management company responsible for seaborne trade of raw materials. The company was founded by Evangelos J. Pistiolis on January 10, 2000 and is headquartered in Maroussi, Greece.

PLYM vs TOPS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PLYM
PLYM
1.4× larger
PLYM
$51.2M
$36.6M
TOPS
Higher net margin
TOPS
TOPS
94.0% more per $
TOPS
-12.2%
-106.3%
PLYM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Revenue
$51.2M
$36.6M
Net Profit
$-54.4M
$-4.5M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
-102.5%
22.0%
Net Margin
-106.3%
-12.2%
Revenue YoY
-1.4%
Net Profit YoY
-248.5%
EPS (diluted)
$-1.23
$-0.96

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$36.6M
Q3 25
$51.2M
Q2 25
$47.2M
Q1 25
$45.6M
Q4 24
$47.6M
Q3 24
$51.9M
Q2 24
$48.7M
Q1 24
$50.2M
Net Profit
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$-4.5M
Q3 25
$-54.4M
Q2 25
$-6.1M
Q1 25
$5.8M
Q4 24
$147.4M
Q3 24
$-15.6M
Q2 24
$1.3M
Q1 24
$6.2M
Operating Margin
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
22.0%
Q3 25
-102.5%
Q2 25
-10.3%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
-29.6%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
Net Margin
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
-12.2%
Q3 25
-106.3%
Q2 25
-12.9%
Q1 25
12.8%
Q4 24
309.9%
Q3 24
-30.1%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
12.4%
EPS (diluted)
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$-0.96
Q3 25
$-1.23
Q2 25
$-0.14
Q1 25
$0.13
Q4 24
$3.24
Q3 24
$-0.35
Q2 24
$0.03
Q1 24
$0.14

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$20.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$216.6M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$470.1M
$89.2M
Total Assets
$1.6B
$333.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.43×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$20.4M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Total Debt
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$216.6M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$646.4M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$89.2M
Q3 25
$470.1M
Q2 25
$539.6M
Q1 25
$571.0M
Q4 24
$579.5M
Q3 24
$436.5M
Q2 24
$475.2M
Q1 24
$484.6M
Total Assets
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$333.6M
Q3 25
$1.6B
Q2 25
$1.6B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.5B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Q1 24
$1.4B
Debt / Equity
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
2.43×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.12×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$20.0M
$26.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
$26.4M
Q3 25
$20.0M
Q2 25
$23.4M
Q1 25
$15.6M
Q4 24
$96.1M
Q3 24
$17.6M
Q2 24
$19.9M
Q1 24
$16.6M
Cash Conversion
PLYM
PLYM
TOPS
TOPS
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
2.67×
Q4 24
0.65×
Q3 24
Q2 24
15.12×
Q1 24
2.67×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons