vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. (PLYM) and TWIN DISC INC (TWIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TWIN DISC INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($90.2M vs $51.2M, roughly 1.8× Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc.). TWIN DISC INC runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs -106.3%, a 131.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TWIN DISC INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.3% vs -1.4%). Over the past eight quarters, TWIN DISC INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Plymouth Industrial REIT, Inc. is a real estate investment trust focused on owning, operating, and acquiring high-quality industrial properties including distribution centers, warehouses, and light industrial facilities across key U.S. logistics hubs. It serves tenants in e-commerce, retail, manufacturing, and third-party logistics sectors, supporting diverse business supply chain needs.
Twin Disc, Inc. designs, manufactures, and distributes power transmission equipment for a wide range of applications, including marine, off-road vehicle, and industrial. The company was founded in 1918 to manufacture clutches for farm tractors. It is now a worldwide company with subsidiaries or sales offices in Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, and South America.
PLYM vs TWIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.2M | $90.2M |
| Net Profit | $-54.4M | $22.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Operating Margin | -102.5% | 2.3% |
| Net Margin | -106.3% | 24.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.4% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -248.5% | 2334.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.23 | $1.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $90.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.2M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.2M | $96.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.6M | $81.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.6M | $89.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.9M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.7M | $84.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2M | $74.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-54.4M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $919.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.6M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.2M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -102.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.3% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 309.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.23 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.24 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.35 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.03 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.14 | $0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $44.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.1M | $184.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $384.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.4M | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.1M | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $539.6M | $164.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $571.0M | $149.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $579.5M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $436.5M | $157.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $475.2M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.6M | $146.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $384.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $363.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $355.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $332.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $307.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $323.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $312.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $288.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.12× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.0M | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-70.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.6M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | $6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $906.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.65× | 9.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.12× | 1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.67× | 1.63× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
