vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× Pinnacle West Capital). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 1.6%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 3.0%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $-192.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 8.9%).
Pinnacle West Capital Corporation is an American utility holding company that owns Arizona Public Service (APS). It is publicly traded on the New York Stock exchange and a component of the S&P 500 stock market index. APS is the largest utility company in Arizona and is regulated by the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC).
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
PNW vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $17.6M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.6% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 798.0% | 53.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.6M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $417.5M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $196.9M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-338.0K | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.5M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $399.3M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.1M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.39 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.58 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.04 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.37 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.76 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.6M | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.0B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $30.0B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6M | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0M | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.2M | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.0B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.0B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.9B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.7B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $476.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-192.7M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -17.1% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 59.3% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 27.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-819.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $476.8M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $665.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.4M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $401.9M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $439.5M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $633.2M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.8M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-192.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-448.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-220.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-92.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-344.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.09× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.59× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.59× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.91× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PNW
| Electricand Transmission Service | $1.1B | 100% |
| Other Services | $4.4M | 0% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
