vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Post Holdings, Inc. (POST) and Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Post Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.7× Qnity Electronics, Inc.). Qnity Electronics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 4.5%, a 12.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Qnity Electronics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 10.1%). Qnity Electronics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($568.0M vs $119.3M).
Post Consumer Brands, LLC, also known as Post, is an American consumer packaged goods food manufacturer headquartered in Lakeville, Minnesota.
POST vs Q — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $96.8M | $211.0M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 21.3% |
| Net Margin | 4.5% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -14.6% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.71 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $96.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.6M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.6% | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.5% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.71 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.91 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.79 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.78 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.28 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.53 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $279.3M | $128.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.5B | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $9.1B |
| Total Assets | $13.0B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.16× | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $279.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $176.7M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $617.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $872.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $787.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $333.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.61× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $235.7M | $782.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $119.3M | $568.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.5% | 44.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.4% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.43× | 3.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $436.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $235.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.3M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $160.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $249.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.6M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $171.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $150.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.91× | 3.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.74× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.88× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.57× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
POST
| Post Consumer Brands Segment | $1.1B | 51% |
| Pet Food | $360.4M | 17% |
| Side Dishes | $221.5M | 10% |
| Weetabix | $137.9M | 6% |
| Other | $122.1M | 6% |
| Nut Butters | $105.8M | 5% |
| Sausage | $53.1M | 2% |
| Cheeseand Dairy | $41.3M | 2% |
| Protein Based Shakes | $29.3M | 1% |
| Bell Ring | $18.1M | 1% |
Q
| Semiconductor Technologies | $693.0M | 54% |
| Interconnect Solutions | $583.0M | 46% |