vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Outdoor Holding Co (POWW) and TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC (TACT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Outdoor Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.4M vs $11.5M, roughly 1.2× TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC). On growth, TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.9% vs -54.1%). Outdoor Holding Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.0M vs $589.0K).
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
POWW vs TACT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.4M | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | -10.1% |
| Net Margin | 16.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -54.1% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.7M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $15.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $-143.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-77.5M | $19.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.4M | $-551.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $-319.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 87.1% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 49.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.2% | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.5% | 48.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.4% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 86.9% | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 85.8% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.6% |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | -10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -213.6% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -163.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -50.3% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.8% | -3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -54.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -614.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -208.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -103.7% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -120.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | -9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.67 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.9M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $237.3M | $31.1M |
| Total Assets | $271.7M | $44.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.4M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.5M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.6M | $10.6M |
| Q4 25 | $237.3M | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.4M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $222.5M | $31.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.6M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $325.6M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.5M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $358.0M | $38.6M |
| Q4 25 | $271.7M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.3M | $45.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.5M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.3M | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.4M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $368.9M | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.6M | $50.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $403.0M | $51.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $609.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.0M | $589.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.3M | $7.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $609.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-161.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.3M | $327.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-547.5K | $636.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3M | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $-171.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $720.3K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $259.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $499.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.8% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -88.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.29× | 242.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
