vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Outdoor Holding Co (POWW) and TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (TLSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Outdoor Holding Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.4M vs $13.2M, roughly 1.0× TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.). Outdoor Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs -73.9%, a 90.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (59.8% vs -54.1%). Outdoor Holding Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.0M vs $-2.5M).
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on advancing immuno-oncology and interventional oncology solutions. It develops proprietary targeted drug delivery technologies designed to improve treatment efficacy for patients with liver, pancreatic and other hard-to-treat solid tumors, primarily operating in North American markets via partnerships with clinical care and research institutions.
POWW vs TLSI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.4M | $13.2M |
| Net Profit | $2.2M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 86.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | -24.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.7% | -73.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -54.1% | 59.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.5% | 3.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.3M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.7M | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-77.5M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.4M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $-13.2M |
| Q4 25 | 87.1% | 86.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 83.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.2% | 83.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.5% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.4% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 86.9% | 86.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 85.8% | 87.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 85.0% |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -77.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.7% | -65.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -213.6% | -79.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -163.8% | -91.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -50.3% | -118.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.8% | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -180.8% |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | -73.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | -93.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -54.5% | -73.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -614.5% | -113.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -208.7% | -122.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -103.7% | -32.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -120.2% | -58.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | -204.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.67 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.9M | $20.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $237.3M | $-33.9M |
| Total Assets | $271.7M | $35.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $22.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.4M | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.5M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.8M | $16.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.6M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $237.3M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.4M | $-26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $222.5M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.6M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $325.6M | $-20.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.5M | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $358.0M | $-36.0M |
| Q4 25 | $271.7M | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.3M | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.5M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.4M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $368.9M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.6M | $32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $403.0M | $17.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-2.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.0M | $-2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | -19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.3M | $-19.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-547.5K | $-13.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $720.3K | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $-10.9M |
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | -19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.8% | -66.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.6% | -57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | -69.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -88.3% | -149.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | -183.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | -169.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.7% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
