vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Outdoor Holding Co (POWW) and Valens Semiconductor Ltd. (VLN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Valens Semiconductor Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($17.3M vs $13.4M, roughly 1.3× Outdoor Holding Co). Outdoor Holding Co runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs -42.2%, a 58.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Valens Semiconductor Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -54.1%). Outdoor Holding Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.0M vs $-4.9M).
Vista Outdoor Inc. was an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer that operated in two segments: shooting sports and outdoor products. It was a "house of brands" with more than 40 labels and subsidiaries.
Valens Semiconductor (Valens) is an Israeli fabless manufacturing company providing semiconductors for the automotive and audio-video industries. Valens provides semiconductor products for the distribution of uncompressed ultra-high-definition (UHD) multimedia content and in-vehicle connectivity applications. The company is a member of the MIPI Alliance and developed the first-to-market chipset that is compliant with the MIPI A-PHY standard. Valens invented the technology behind the HDBaseT s...
POWW vs VLN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.4M | $17.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.2M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 87.1% | 63.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | -46.4% |
| Net Margin | 16.7% | -42.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -54.1% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.5% | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $-0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.0M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.3M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-77.5M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 87.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.1% | 63.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 87.2% | 63.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.5% | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 87.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 86.9% | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 85.8% | 61.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.7% | -43.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -213.6% | -56.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -163.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -50.3% | -76.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.8% | -69.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | -42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -54.5% | -42.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -614.5% | -49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -208.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -103.7% | -64.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -120.2% | -65.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.67 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.9M | $93.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $237.3M | $108.8M |
| Total Assets | $271.7M | $136.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.7M | $93.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.4M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.2M | $112.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.5M | $133.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.8M | $105.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $237.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.4M | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $222.5M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.0M | $128.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $325.6M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.5M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $358.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $271.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.3M | $136.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $269.5M | $144.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $297.3M | $154.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $368.9M | $171.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $398.6M | $175.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $403.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-4.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.0M | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.6% | -28.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.55× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-2.3M | $-11.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $-211.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.5M | $-7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-547.5K | $-225.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | $-330.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $720.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.6M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-460.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.0% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -63.8% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.6% | -47.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -88.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.