vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp (PRCT) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $83.1M, roughly 1.6× PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -38.1%, a 55.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp's revenue compounded faster (24.8% CAGR vs 11.6%).
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corp is a medical tech firm developing and commercializing robotic surgical solutions for urological care. Its flagship AquaBeam system provides image-guided minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, serving providers and patients across North America, Europe and global markets.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
PRCT vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.1M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $-31.6M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 64.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -38.1% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.2% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.9% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.56 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $83.1M | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $76.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.3M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.2M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.2M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.4M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | $-31.6M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-29.8M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.4M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.6M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.6M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 60.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | -4.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -40.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -27.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -28.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.9% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -50.3% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | -38.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -39.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.7% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.7% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.6% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -35.9% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -48.0% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.56 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.54 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.38 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.35 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.45 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.34 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.40 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.50 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $245.6M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $51.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $347.7M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $487.1M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $245.6M | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $286.5M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $294.3M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.7M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.2M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.7M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $214.1M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | $51.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $347.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $380.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $389.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $402.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $251.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $487.1M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $508.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $511.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $513.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $519.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $534.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $374.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.4M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-10.3M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.6M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.0M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-32.4M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.8M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.7M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.5M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.6M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.0M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.8M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.9% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -49.2% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.6% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.4% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRCT
| Handpieces and other consumables | $43.0M | 52% |
| System sales and rentals | $23.4M | 28% |
| Other | $11.1M | 13% |
| Service | $5.6M | 7% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
