vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and PATTERSON UTI ENERGY INC (PTEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PATTERSON UTI ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $651.6M, roughly 1.7× PROG Holdings, Inc.). PROG Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -2.2%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PROG Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (457.1% vs -12.7%). Over the past eight quarters, PROG Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -8.4%).

PROG Holdings, Inc. is a U.S.-based financial technology firm providing flexible lease-to-own and point-of-sale financing solutions to consumers. Operating primarily in the U.S. market, its core segments include retail partner financing, consumer lending, and payment services that help customers access electronics and household goods without traditional credit requirements.

Patterson UTI Energy Inc. is a leading oilfield services provider offering onshore contract drilling, pressure pumping, well completion and related support services. It primarily serves upstream oil and gas operators across North America, operating in major unconventional resource basins including shale and tight gas formations.

PRG vs PTEN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PTEN
PTEN
1.7× larger
PTEN
$1.1B
$651.6M
PRG
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRG
PRG
+469.9% gap
PRG
457.1%
-12.7%
PTEN
Higher net margin
PRG
PRG
7.7% more per $
PRG
5.5%
-2.2%
PTEN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PRG
PRG
Annualised
PRG
4.9%
-8.4%
PTEN

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Revenue
$651.6M
$1.1B
Net Profit
$36.1M
$-24.5M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
10.0%
Net Margin
5.5%
-2.2%
Revenue YoY
457.1%
-12.7%
Net Profit YoY
3.8%
-170.8%
EPS (diluted)
$3.68
$-0.06

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$651.6M
$1.1B
Q4 25
$525.4M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$595.1M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$604.7M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$684.1M
$1.3B
Q4 24
$558.9M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$606.1M
$1.3B
Q2 24
$592.2M
$1.3B
Net Profit
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$36.1M
$-24.5M
Q4 25
$40.5M
$-9.2M
Q3 25
$33.1M
$-36.4M
Q2 25
$38.5M
$-49.1M
Q1 25
$34.7M
$1.0M
Q4 24
$57.5M
$-51.4M
Q3 24
$84.0M
$-978.8M
Q2 24
$33.8M
$11.1M
Operating Margin
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
10.0%
Q4 25
6.9%
-0.0%
Q3 25
9.0%
-2.4%
Q2 25
10.0%
-2.4%
Q1 25
8.2%
1.3%
Q4 24
8.9%
-2.7%
Q3 24
8.1%
-73.8%
Q2 24
9.4%
3.4%
Net Margin
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
5.5%
-2.2%
Q4 25
7.7%
-0.8%
Q3 25
5.6%
-3.1%
Q2 25
6.4%
-4.1%
Q1 25
5.1%
0.1%
Q4 24
10.3%
-4.5%
Q3 24
13.9%
-72.9%
Q2 24
5.7%
0.8%
EPS (diluted)
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$3.68
$-0.06
Q4 25
$0.99
$-0.01
Q3 25
$0.82
$-0.10
Q2 25
$0.95
$-0.13
Q1 25
$0.83
$0.00
Q4 24
$1.33
$-0.10
Q3 24
$1.94
$-2.50
Q2 24
$0.77
$0.03

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$69.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$774.4M
$3.2B
Total Assets
$2.0B
$5.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$69.4M
Q4 25
$308.8M
$418.5M
Q3 25
$292.6M
$184.8M
Q2 25
$222.0M
$183.8M
Q1 25
$213.3M
$223.1M
Q4 24
$90.9M
$239.2M
Q3 24
$221.7M
$113.4M
Q2 24
$250.1M
$72.4M
Total Debt
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$594.9M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$643.6M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$774.4M
$3.2B
Q4 25
$746.4M
$3.2B
Q3 25
$703.6M
$3.2B
Q2 25
$668.7M
$3.3B
Q1 25
$654.4M
$3.4B
Q4 24
$650.3M
$3.5B
Q3 24
$630.8M
$3.6B
Q2 24
$581.9M
$4.6B
Total Assets
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$2.0B
$5.4B
Q4 25
$1.6B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$5.5B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$5.6B
Q1 25
$1.5B
$5.8B
Q4 24
$1.5B
$5.8B
Q3 24
$1.4B
$6.0B
Q2 24
$1.5B
$7.0B
Debt / Equity
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.80×
0.38×
Q3 25
0.38×
Q2 25
0.37×
Q1 25
0.36×
Q4 24
0.99×
0.36×
Q3 24
0.35×
Q2 24
0.27×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$63.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
$63.9M
Q4 25
$-54.9M
$397.5M
Q3 25
$110.0M
$215.8M
Q2 25
$69.9M
$139.7M
Q1 25
$209.9M
$208.1M
Q4 24
$-84.5M
$315.8M
Q3 24
$31.9M
$296.3M
Q2 24
$55.4M
$197.5M
Free Cash Flow
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-57.5M
$259.0M
Q3 25
$106.5M
$71.3M
Q2 25
$68.0M
$-4.5M
Q1 25
$208.0M
$46.3M
Q4 24
$-86.8M
$175.5M
Q3 24
$29.8M
$115.7M
Q2 24
$53.5M
$67.0M
FCF Margin
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
-10.9%
22.6%
Q3 25
17.9%
6.1%
Q2 25
11.2%
-0.4%
Q1 25
30.4%
3.7%
Q4 24
-15.5%
15.3%
Q3 24
4.9%
8.6%
Q2 24
9.0%
5.0%
Capex Intensity
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
4.9%
Q4 25
0.5%
12.1%
Q3 25
0.6%
12.3%
Q2 25
0.3%
11.9%
Q1 25
0.3%
12.8%
Q4 24
0.4%
12.2%
Q3 24
0.3%
13.5%
Q2 24
0.3%
9.8%
Cash Conversion
PRG
PRG
PTEN
PTEN
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1.36×
Q3 25
3.32×
Q2 25
1.82×
Q1 25
6.05×
207.11×
Q4 24
-1.47×
Q3 24
0.38×
Q2 24
1.64×
17.83×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons