vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.3× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs 5.8%, a 19.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 2.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 4.9%).
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
PRK vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $168.3M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $42.6M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 25.3% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.2% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.4% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $168.3M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.5M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.7M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.3M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $152.8M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $42.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.8% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.0% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.92 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.97 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.60 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.38 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.35 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.42 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.17 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $233.5M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $9.8B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $233.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $218.9M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.1M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $237.6M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.6M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.7M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.1M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9B | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $198.3M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $191.9M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 114.1% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.65× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.2M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $198.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.6M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.7M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.9M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $178.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $191.9M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.8M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.9M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 114.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.1% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 103.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.8% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.65× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.90× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.63× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.99× | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
