vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Public Storage (PSA) and Tyler Technologies (TYL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Public Storage is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $613.5M, roughly 2.0× Tyler Technologies). Public Storage runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs 13.2%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tyler Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs 3.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Tyler Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 2.5%).

Public Storage, headquartered in Glendale, California, is a real estate investment trust that invests in self storage. It is the largest brand of self-storage services in the US and owns approximately 9% of the self storage square footage in the U.S. As of December 31, 2024, the company operated 3,073 self-storage facilities containing an aggregate of 221 million net rentable square feet of space.

Tyler Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company based in Plano, Texas, that provides proprietary software to the U.S. public sector. Tyler Technologies has offices in 17 states and one in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PSA vs TYL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PSA
PSA
2.0× larger
PSA
$1.2B
$613.5M
TYL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TYL
TYL
+5.3% gap
TYL
8.6%
3.3%
PSA
Higher net margin
PSA
PSA
28.5% more per $
PSA
41.7%
13.2%
TYL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TYL
TYL
Annualised
TYL
6.5%
2.5%
PSA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Revenue
$1.2B
$613.5M
Net Profit
$507.1M
$81.2M
Gross Margin
48.3%
Operating Margin
40.7%
16.3%
Net Margin
41.7%
13.2%
Revenue YoY
3.3%
8.6%
Net Profit YoY
-17.5%
EPS (diluted)
$2.59
$1.88

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$613.5M
Q4 25
$1.2B
$575.2M
Q3 25
$1.2B
$595.9M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$596.1M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$565.2M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$541.1M
Q3 24
$1.2B
$543.3M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$541.0M
Net Profit
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$81.2M
Q4 25
$507.1M
$65.5M
Q3 25
$511.1M
$84.4M
Q2 25
$358.4M
$84.6M
Q1 25
$407.8M
$81.1M
Q4 24
$614.6M
$65.2M
Q3 24
$430.3M
$75.9M
Q2 24
$518.1M
$67.7M
Gross Margin
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
48.3%
Q4 25
45.5%
Q3 25
47.2%
Q2 25
45.8%
Q1 25
47.3%
Q4 24
43.8%
Q3 24
43.7%
Q2 24
44.0%
Operating Margin
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
16.3%
Q4 25
40.7%
13.0%
Q3 25
42.3%
16.4%
Q2 25
30.4%
16.0%
Q1 25
34.8%
15.8%
Q4 24
52.4%
13.2%
Q3 24
36.7%
15.2%
Q2 24
44.6%
14.4%
Net Margin
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
13.2%
Q4 25
41.7%
11.4%
Q3 25
41.8%
14.2%
Q2 25
29.8%
14.2%
Q1 25
34.5%
14.3%
Q4 24
52.2%
12.1%
Q3 24
36.2%
14.0%
Q2 24
44.2%
12.5%
EPS (diluted)
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$1.88
Q4 25
$2.59
$1.50
Q3 25
$2.62
$1.93
Q2 25
$1.76
$1.93
Q1 25
$2.04
$1.84
Q4 24
$3.22
$1.48
Q3 24
$2.16
$1.74
Q2 24
$2.66
$1.57

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$318.1M
$346.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$10.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$9.2B
$3.6B
Total Assets
$20.2B
$4.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.11×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$346.4M
Q4 25
$318.1M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$296.5M
$950.8M
Q2 25
$1.1B
$892.3M
Q1 25
$287.2M
$807.4M
Q4 24
$447.4M
$768.0M
Q3 24
$599.0M
$544.3M
Q2 24
$542.3M
$258.0M
Total Debt
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
Q4 25
$10.3B
$599.7M
Q3 25
$10.0B
$599.2M
Q2 25
$10.4B
$598.8M
Q1 25
$9.4B
$598.4M
Q4 24
$9.4B
$597.9M
Q3 24
$9.5B
$597.5M
Q2 24
$9.4B
$597.1M
Stockholders' Equity
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$9.2B
$3.7B
Q3 25
$9.3B
$3.6B
Q2 25
$9.4B
$3.6B
Q1 25
$9.6B
$3.5B
Q4 24
$9.7B
$3.4B
Q3 24
$9.6B
$3.3B
Q2 24
$9.7B
$3.1B
Total Assets
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$4.8B
Q4 25
$20.2B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$20.1B
$5.5B
Q2 25
$20.5B
$5.4B
Q1 25
$19.6B
$5.2B
Q4 24
$19.8B
$5.2B
Q3 24
$19.8B
$5.0B
Q2 24
$19.8B
$4.8B
Debt / Equity
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.11×
0.16×
Q3 25
1.08×
0.17×
Q2 25
1.11×
0.16×
Q1 25
0.99×
0.17×
Q4 24
0.96×
0.18×
Q3 24
0.99×
0.18×
Q2 24
0.97×
0.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$733.6M
$107.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.45×
1.32×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$585.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$107.3M
Q4 25
$733.6M
$243.9M
Q3 25
$875.1M
$255.2M
Q2 25
$872.7M
$98.3M
Q1 25
$705.1M
$56.2M
Q4 24
$768.6M
$224.8M
Q3 24
$798.8M
$263.7M
Q2 24
$895.3M
$64.3M
Free Cash Flow
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
$2.0M
Q4 25
$239.6M
Q3 25
$251.3M
Q2 25
$92.8M
Q1 25
$53.8M
Q4 24
$221.0M
Q3 24
$260.8M
Q2 24
$57.7M
FCF Margin
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
0.3%
Q4 25
41.7%
Q3 25
42.2%
Q2 25
15.6%
Q1 25
9.5%
Q4 24
40.8%
Q3 24
48.0%
Q2 24
10.7%
Capex Intensity
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.8%
Q3 25
0.7%
Q2 25
0.9%
Q1 25
0.4%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
0.5%
Q2 24
1.2%
Cash Conversion
PSA
PSA
TYL
TYL
Q1 26
1.32×
Q4 25
1.45×
3.72×
Q3 25
1.71×
3.02×
Q2 25
2.43×
1.16×
Q1 25
1.73×
0.69×
Q4 24
1.25×
3.45×
Q3 24
1.86×
3.47×
Q2 24
1.73×
0.95×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

PSA
PSA

Self Storage Operations$1.1B93%
Ancillary Operations$86.9M7%

TYL
TYL

Subscriptions$429.7M70%
Maintenance$108.9M18%
Other$74.9M12%

Related Comparisons