vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Performance Shipping Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.5M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.0× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). Performance Shipping Inc. runs the higher net margin — 97.5% vs 54.9%, a 42.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -7.9%).
Azerbaijan Caspian Shipping Closed Joint-Stock Company is a state-owned Azerbaijani shipping company. It is also known by its Russian-derived abbreviation CASPAR.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
PSHG vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $39.5M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $38.5M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 93.3% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 97.5% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.9% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 78.1% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.00 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 93.3% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 97.5% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.4% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.00 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.55 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $95.8M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $43.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $312.8M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $363.8M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.14× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.8M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.7M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $312.8M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.0M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.8M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $310.5M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $527.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $26.8M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.70× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.8M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.70× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSHG
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
