vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PSIX) and Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc (PTGX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($191.2M vs $170.6M, roughly 1.1× Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc). Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc runs the higher net margin — 77.2% vs 8.4%, a 68.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (184.4% vs 32.5%). Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($182.8M vs $-7.6M).
Adani Energy Solutions Ltd, formerly known as Adani Transmission Ltd, is an electric power transmission and distribution company headquartered in Ahmedabad. As of April 2025, the company operates a cumulative transmission network of 26,696 circuit kilometers and is one of the largest private sector power transmission companies operating in India.
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering and developing novel peptide-based targeted therapies for unmet medical needs, primarily covering gastrointestinal disorders, inflammatory diseases and rare disease indications. Its lead product candidates target inflammatory bowel disease and other chronic immune-related conditions, with operations spanning global R&D and partnership collaborations.
PSIX vs PTGX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $191.2M | $170.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.1M | $131.7M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 74.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 77.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.5% | 184.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.0% | 381.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $191.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.3M | $170.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.2M | $255.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $207.3M |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 74.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.2% | 80.9% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 77.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.5% | 81.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.22 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.83 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $2.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.94 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.31 | $3.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.3M | $418.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $96.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $178.6M | $675.3M |
| Total Assets | $424.7M | $744.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.3M | $418.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $322.6M |
| Q4 25 | $96.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $345.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $178.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.3M | $675.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $560.4M |
| Q4 25 | $424.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.2M | $744.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $286.8M | $629.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.6M | $184.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.6M | $182.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.0% | 107.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.1M | $101.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $184.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.6M | $-27.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $182.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $822.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8M | $-27.7M |
| Q4 25 | -4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 107.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.6% | -10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.20× | -0.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSIX
| Energy End Market | $153.4M | 80% |
| Industrial End Market | $33.3M | 17% |
| Transportation End Market | $4.6M | 2% |
PTGX
Segment breakdown not available.
