vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (PSIX) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($191.2M vs $132.6M, roughly 1.4× Urban Edge Properties). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 8.4%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.5% vs 12.2%). Over the past eight quarters, POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (41.7% CAGR vs 11.6%).
Adani Energy Solutions Ltd, formerly known as Adani Transmission Ltd, is an electric power transmission and distribution company headquartered in Ahmedabad. As of April 2025, the company operates a cumulative transmission network of 26,696 circuit kilometers and is one of the largest private sector power transmission companies operating in India.
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
PSIX vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $191.2M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.1M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 8.4% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 32.5% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.0% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.69 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.2M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.8M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.9M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.4M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.3M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $125.8M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.6M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.5M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.9% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.69 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.20 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.22 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.83 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.01 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.94 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.3M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $96.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $178.6M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $424.7M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.5M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.3M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.5M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.8M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $84.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $424.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $437.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.6M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.6M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.29× | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.6M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.7M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.6M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.6M | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $822.0K | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.0% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.29× | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.12× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.73× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSIX
| Energy End Market | $153.4M | 80% |
| Industrial End Market | $33.3M | 17% |
| Transportation End Market | $4.6M | 2% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |