vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Paramount Skydance Corporation (PSKY) and SMITHFIELD FOODS INC (SFD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Paramount Skydance Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.1× SMITHFIELD FOODS INC). SMITHFIELD FOODS INC runs the higher net margin — 6.6% vs -0.3%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SMITHFIELD FOODS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -38.8%).
Paramount Skydance Corporation is an American multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate. The company is headquartered at the Paramount Pictures lot in the Hollywood neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, with multiple of Paramount's divisions and subsidiaries, as well as one of Paramount's major offices and meeting places, being headquartered at the previous Paramount Global headquarters at One Astor Plaza in New York City.
Smithfield Foods, Inc., is a Hong Kong-owned pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia. Founded in 1936 as the Smithfield Packing Company by Joseph W. Luter and his son, the company is the largest pig and pork producer in the world. In addition to owning over 500 farms in the US, Smithfield contracts with another 2,000 independent farms around the country to raise Smithfield's pigs. Outside the US, the company has facilities in Mexico, Poland, Romania, Germany, S...
PSKY vs SFD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.1B | $3.8B |
| Net Profit | $-13.0M | $249.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | -0.3% | 6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.8% | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1400.0% | 9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $249.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $327.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.0M | $248.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $188.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $224.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.00 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.0B | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $43.2B | $12.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.11× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2B | $11.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $11.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.11× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $222.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $938.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $268.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $274.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | $-166.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $842.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.0M | $-75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $196.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-245.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
PSKY
| Affiliate And Subscription | $2.0B | 49% |
| Advertising | $1.3B | 31% |
| Licensing And Other | $775.0M | 19% |
| Related Party | $40.0M | 1% |
| Theatrical | $39.0M | 1% |
SFD
Segment breakdown not available.
