vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) and DNA X, Inc. (SONM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $16.2M, roughly 1.6× DNA X, Inc.). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -29.3%, a 47.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Postal Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs 9.9%).
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
PSTL vs SONM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.0M | $16.2M |
| Net Profit | $4.6M | $-4.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | -24.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | -29.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.7% | 7.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.1% | -89.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.16 | $-4.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.3M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.4M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.1M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.3M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $458.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $817.0K | $-6.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $206.0K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | -24.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.3% | -60.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.2% | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | -15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | -56.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | -29.5% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | -29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | -66.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | -141.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | -16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | -57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-4.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | $-116.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.03 | $-9.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-1.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.65 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $2.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $361.1M | $5.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $285.2M | $-701.0K |
| Total Assets | $759.1M | $40.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $970.0K | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $347.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $306.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $277.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $285.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $273.9M | $-701.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $250.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $245.5M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.3M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $245.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $245.5M | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $248.1M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $759.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $735.2M | $40.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $689.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $646.8M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $615.1M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $608.2M | $45.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $584.1M | $42.4M |
| Q4 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $44.5M | $-7.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 144.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 26.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 9.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $-417.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.4M | $-168.0K |
| Q4 25 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.4M | $-554.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $-198.0K |
| Q4 25 | 144.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 143.8% | -29.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.6% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.4% | -29.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.6% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 9.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.20× | -20.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.10× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.07× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
