vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Perella Weinberg Partners is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($219.2M vs $200.5M, roughly 1.1× ROGERS CORP). Perella Weinberg Partners runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 2.2%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ROGERS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.2% vs -2.9%). Perella Weinberg Partners produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.5M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs -3.3%).
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
PWP vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $219.2M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $13.8M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $219.2M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.6M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.3M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $211.8M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.7M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $278.2M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.0M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-66.0M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -30.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.3% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.24 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.24 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.21 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $255.9M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-127.4M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $797.6M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $255.9M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.5M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $145.0M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.2M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $407.4M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $335.1M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $185.3M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-127.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-302.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-318.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-323.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-421.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-360.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-283.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $797.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $650.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $606.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $570.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $876.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $810.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $645.5M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $34.8M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $30.5M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.9% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.52× | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-34.1M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.8M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-176.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.4M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.3M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.0M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.5M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-177.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $207.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.3M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.7M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.9% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -83.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.8% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.85× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.23× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
