vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Qnity Electronics, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $809.5M, roughly 1.6× Construction Partners, Inc.). Qnity Electronics, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 16.5% vs 2.1%, a 14.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Construction Partners, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (44.1% vs 11.1%). Qnity Electronics, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($568.0M vs $47.1M).
Alexander Construction Company was a Palm Springs, California, residential development company that built over 2,200 houses in the Coachella Valley of Riverside County, California, between 1955 and 1965.
Q vs ROAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $809.5M |
| Net Profit | $211.0M | $17.2M |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.3% | 6.2% |
| Net Margin | 16.5% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 44.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.0% | 663.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $809.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $899.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $779.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $571.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $561.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $538.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $517.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $371.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.0M | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.0M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 47.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.95 | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.0M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.1B | $969.1M |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $128.0M | $156.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $101.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $48.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $515.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $969.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1B | $912.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $853.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $807.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $811.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1B | $573.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $552.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $525.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | 1.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $782.0M | $82.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $568.0M | $47.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 44.5% | 5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.8% | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.71× | 4.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $186.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $782.0M | $112.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.0M | $78.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.71× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
Q
| Semiconductor Technologies | $693.0M | 54% |
| Interconnect Solutions | $583.0M | 46% |
ROAD
Segment breakdown not available.