vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QUALYS, INC. (QLYS) and INTERFACE INC (TILE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERFACE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($349.4M vs $175.3M, roughly 2.0× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 7.0%, a 23.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, QUALYS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 4.3%). QUALYS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.9M vs $28.6M). Over the past eight quarters, INTERFACE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs 9.6%).
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
Interface, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is a global manufacturer of commercial flooring. The company sells modular carpet tiles, luxury vinyl tile, and Nora brand rubber flooring.
QLYS vs TILE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $175.3M | $349.4M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $24.4M |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 30.3% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.9% | 12.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.47 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $364.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.1M | $375.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | $297.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $335.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $344.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.7M | $346.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8M | $289.7M |
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.3M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.5M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $21.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.7M | $14.2M |
| Q4 25 | 83.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.6% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.4% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.9% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.8% | 36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.3% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.2% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.3% | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | 33.6% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.7% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | 4.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.47 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.39 | $0.78 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.29 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.29 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $250.3M | $71.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $181.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $561.2M | $640.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $250.3M | $71.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.3M | $187.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.7M | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.2M | $99.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.2M | $94.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $273.8M | $89.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $181.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $302.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $302.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $337.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $387.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | $561.2M | $640.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.4M | $621.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $508.2M | $575.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $513.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.1M | $489.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $449.6M | $501.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $427.8M | $451.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.2M | $428.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $999.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $973.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $861.8M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.91× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.7M | $49.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $74.9M | $28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.8% | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 5.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.42× | 2.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $304.4M | $121.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.6M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $76.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.8M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.5M | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.5M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.5M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.9M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.6M | $69.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | 42.8% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.2% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.42× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.32× | 2.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.15× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |
TILE
| AMS | $205.9M | 59% |
| EAAA | $143.5M | 41% |