vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QUALYS, INC. (QLYS) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($220.8M vs $175.3M, roughly 1.3× QUALYS, INC.). QUALYS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 30.3% vs 5.8%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, QUALYS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.1% vs 9.6%). QUALYS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($74.9M vs $-19.2M). Over the past eight quarters, QUALYS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs 9.5%).
Qualys, Inc. is an American technology firm based in Foster City, California, specializing in cloud security, compliance and related services.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
QLYS vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $175.3M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $53.1M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.6% | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 30.3% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.1% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.9% | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.47 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $175.3M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.1M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.2M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $153.9M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.7M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $53.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.3M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.7M | $7.8M |
| Q4 25 | 83.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 81.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.4% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.7% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 30.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | 4.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.47 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.39 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.29 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.29 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.24 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.17 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.05 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $250.3M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $561.2M | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $250.3M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.3M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.0M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.7M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $232.2M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.4M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $281.2M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $273.8M | $116.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.9M |
| Q4 25 | $561.2M | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $529.4M | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $508.2M | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.0M | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $477.1M | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $449.6M | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $427.8M | $239.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $404.2M | $232.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $999.5M | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.5M | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $973.5M | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $908.3M | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $876.6M | $706.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $861.8M | $702.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.7M | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $74.9M | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 42.8% | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.42× | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $304.4M | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.6M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.5M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $74.9M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.4M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.5M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.6M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.5M | $-8.4M |
| Q4 25 | 42.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.3% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.4% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.2% | -4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.42× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.31× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.32× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.15× | -0.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
QLYS
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $88.6M | 51% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $86.7M | 49% |
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
