vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Quantum-Si Inc (QSI) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Serve Robotics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($881.5K vs $451.0K, roughly 2.0× Quantum-Si Inc). Serve Robotics Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3888.1% vs -3904.9%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs -62.2%). Quantum-Si Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-16.4M vs $-46.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Quantum-Si Inc's revenue compounded faster (-0.7% CAGR vs -3.5%).
Silicon Quantum Computing Pty Ltd (SQC) is a Sydney, Australia-based quantum computing company.
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
QSI vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $451.0K | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | $-17.6M | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | 27.1% | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4677.2% | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | -3904.9% | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -62.2% | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 46.8% | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $451.0K | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $552.0K | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $591.0K | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $842.0K | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $787.0K | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $622.0K | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $457.0K | $946.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-17.6M | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-35.7M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.8M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-19.2M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-33.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.3M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.1M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.5M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.4% | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.7% | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.2% | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.6% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.9% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 58.9% | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | -4677.2% | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7205.3% | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5096.4% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2982.4% | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2573.6% | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3569.0% | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4252.6% | -1828.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5111.6% | -814.6% |
| Q4 25 | -3904.9% | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6467.9% | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4879.2% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2279.0% | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2778.6% | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3216.4% | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3713.7% | -1931.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4261.3% | -954.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.16 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $21.6M | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $220.2M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $245.6M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $21.6M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.3M | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.2M | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.3M | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.6M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $220.2M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $235.2M | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $246.9M | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $215.4M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $210.5M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $233.3M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $253.8M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $245.6M | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.1M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $254.4M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.2M | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.9M | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.5M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.7M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $275.6M | $4.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.3M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-16.4M | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3628.4% | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-97.3M | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.3M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.0M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.2M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.9M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.2M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.6M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.2M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.4M | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-32.9M | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.5M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-24.3M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.7M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.3M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | -3628.4% | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5963.6% | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3472.8% | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3261.4% | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2039.9% | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3065.8% | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3164.0% | -1396.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5307.2% | -431.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 163.0% | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.3% | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 155.2% | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 120.4% | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 123.9% | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 181.2% | 169.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 228.9% | 0.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
