vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of QUICKLOGIC Corp (QUIK) and Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
QUICKLOGIC Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7M vs $5.5M, roughly 1.0× Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.). QUICKLOGIC Corp runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -507.8%, a 502.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (171.3% vs -24.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.8% CAGR vs 17.2%).
QuickLogic Corp is a fabless semiconductor company developing low-power customizable FPGAs, embedded FPGA IP, and edge sensor processing solutions. Its offerings serve global wearables, IoT, mobile electronics, and industrial markets, enabling energy-efficient low-latency on-device processing for edge AI and sensing use cases.
Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company specializing in developing adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapies for rare monogenic central nervous system disorders with high unmet medical needs. Its core pipeline targets serious life-threatening neurological conditions, with primary operations and market focus across North America and European regions.
QUIK vs TSHA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.7M | $5.5M |
| Net Profit | $-305.0K | $-27.9M |
| Gross Margin | 62.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | -516.0% |
| Net Margin | -5.4% | -507.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -24.1% | 171.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -114.9% | -48.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7M | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-27.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-305.0K | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.6M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $108.0K | $-24.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -516.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1347.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -930.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -985.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.1% | -1448.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.3% | -1915.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.3% | -713.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -507.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1353.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -935.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.4% | -929.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.8% | -1427.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.8% | -1882.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | -705.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.9M | $246.9M |
| Total Assets | $51.9M | $343.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $297.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $312.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $116.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $139.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $157.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $172.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $124.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $246.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $248.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.9M | $71.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.9M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.8M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.2M | $53.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $343.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $316.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $333.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.9M | $160.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.7M | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $200.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.9M | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.12× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $116.0K | $-26.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -20.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 22.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-5.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0K | $-18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.0K | $-21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-220.0K | $-21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.0K | $-19.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.0K | $-21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.0K | $-19.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -20.6% | -905.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.0% | -1210.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -102.2% | -1951.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | -584.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 96.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
QUIK
| North America | $3.0M | 53% |
| Other | $2.7M | 47% |
TSHA
Segment breakdown not available.
