vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of RYDER SYSTEM INC (R) and Wells Fargo (WFC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Wells Fargo is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.3B vs $13.1B, roughly 1.6× RYDER SYSTEM INC). Wells Fargo runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs 0.7%, a 24.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Wells Fargo posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs 1.0%). Over the past eight quarters, RYDER SYSTEM INC's revenue compounded faster (102.9% CAGR vs 1.0%).

Ryder System, Inc. is an American transportation and logistics company, specializing in truck rental and leasing, fleet management, supply chain management, and transportation management. It also offers full-service leasing, rental and maintenance, used vehicle sales, transportation management, professional drivers, e-commerce fulfillment, and last-mile delivery services. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida, and operates in the United States and United Kingdom.

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company. The company operates in 35 countries and serves more than 70 million customers worldwide. It is a systemically important financial institution according to the Financial Stability Board, and is considered one of the "Big Four Banks" in the United States, alongside JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citigroup.

R vs WFC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
WFC
WFC
1.6× larger
WFC
$21.3B
$13.1B
R
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WFC
WFC
+3.5% gap
WFC
4.5%
1.0%
R
Higher net margin
WFC
WFC
24.5% more per $
WFC
25.2%
0.7%
R
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
R
R
Annualised
R
102.9%
1.0%
WFC

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
R
R
WFC
WFC
Revenue
$13.1B
$21.3B
Net Profit
$93.0M
$5.4B
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
30.7%
Net Margin
0.7%
25.2%
Revenue YoY
1.0%
4.5%
Net Profit YoY
-5.1%
5.6%
EPS (diluted)
$2.34
$1.61

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$13.1B
Q4 25
$3.2B
$21.3B
Q3 25
$3.2B
$21.4B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$20.8B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$20.1B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$20.4B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$20.4B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$20.7B
Net Profit
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$93.0M
Q4 25
$132.0M
$5.4B
Q3 25
$138.0M
$5.6B
Q2 25
$131.0M
$5.5B
Q1 25
$98.0M
$4.9B
Q4 24
$135.0M
$5.1B
Q3 24
$142.0M
$5.1B
Q2 24
$127.0M
$4.9B
Operating Margin
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
Q4 25
5.6%
30.7%
Q3 25
6.0%
32.2%
Q2 25
5.8%
30.9%
Q1 25
4.3%
26.4%
Q4 24
5.7%
26.4%
Q3 24
5.9%
30.6%
Q2 24
5.6%
29.8%
Net Margin
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
0.7%
Q4 25
4.2%
25.2%
Q3 25
4.4%
26.1%
Q2 25
4.1%
26.4%
Q1 25
3.1%
24.3%
Q4 24
4.2%
24.9%
Q3 24
4.5%
25.1%
Q2 24
4.0%
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$2.34
Q4 25
$3.22
$1.61
Q3 25
$3.32
$1.66
Q2 25
$3.13
$1.60
Q1 25
$2.27
$1.39
Q4 24
$3.09
$1.42
Q3 24
$3.24
$1.42
Q2 24
$2.84
$1.33

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
R
R
WFC
WFC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$182.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$174.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.9B
$181.1B
Total Assets
$2148.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.96×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$182.0M
Q4 25
$198.0M
Q3 25
$189.0M
Q2 25
$180.0M
Q1 25
$151.0M
Q4 24
$154.0M
Q3 24
$162.0M
Q2 24
$164.0M
Total Debt
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$6.8B
$174.7B
Q3 25
$7.3B
$177.8B
Q2 25
$7.0B
$176.2B
Q1 25
$6.7B
$173.7B
Q4 24
$6.7B
$173.1B
Q3 24
$6.6B
$182.0B
Q2 24
$6.5B
$179.1B
Stockholders' Equity
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$2.9B
Q4 25
$3.1B
$181.1B
Q3 25
$3.1B
$181.2B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$181.1B
Q1 25
$3.0B
$181.1B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$179.1B
Q3 24
$3.1B
$183.3B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$176.4B
Total Assets
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
Q4 25
$16.4B
$2148.6B
Q3 25
$16.5B
$2062.9B
Q2 25
$16.5B
$1981.3B
Q1 25
$16.4B
$1950.3B
Q4 24
$16.7B
$1929.8B
Q3 24
$16.5B
$1922.1B
Q2 24
$16.4B
$1940.1B
Debt / Equity
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.24×
0.96×
Q3 25
2.35×
0.98×
Q2 25
2.27×
0.97×
Q1 25
2.21×
0.96×
Q4 24
2.14×
0.97×
Q3 24
2.17×
0.99×
Q2 24
2.09×
1.02×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
R
R
WFC
WFC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$583.0M
$4.1B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$273.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.27×
0.77×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$595.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$583.0M
Q4 25
$749.0M
$4.1B
Q3 25
$442.0M
$-869.0M
Q2 25
$752.0M
$-11.2B
Q1 25
$651.0M
$-11.0B
Q4 24
$558.0M
$8.9B
Q3 24
$629.0M
$4.2B
Q2 24
$552.0M
$2.0B
Free Cash Flow
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
$273.0M
Q4 25
$344.0M
Q3 25
$-85.0M
Q2 25
$63.0M
Q1 25
$137.0M
Q4 24
$-201.0M
Q3 24
$30.0M
Q2 24
$-87.0M
FCF Margin
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
2.1%
Q4 25
10.8%
Q3 25
-2.7%
Q2 25
2.0%
Q1 25
4.4%
Q4 24
-6.3%
Q3 24
0.9%
Q2 24
-2.7%
Capex Intensity
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
3.3%
Q4 25
12.8%
Q3 25
16.6%
Q2 25
21.6%
Q1 25
16.4%
Q4 24
23.8%
Q3 24
18.9%
Q2 24
20.1%
Cash Conversion
R
R
WFC
WFC
Q1 26
6.27×
Q4 25
5.67×
0.77×
Q3 25
3.20×
-0.16×
Q2 25
5.74×
-2.04×
Q1 25
6.64×
-2.26×
Q4 24
4.13×
1.75×
Q3 24
4.43×
0.82×
Q2 24
4.35×
0.42×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

R
R

Segment breakdown not available.

WFC
WFC

Other$5.2B24%
Wealth And Investment Management$3.4B16%
Investment Advisory Management And Administrative Service$2.8B13%
Corporate And Investment Banking$2.5B12%
Consumer Banking And Lending$2.0B10%
Commercial Portfolio Segment$1.1B5%
Commercial Banking$1.1B5%
Credit Card Rewards And Rebates$859.0M4%
Investment Advice$716.0M3%
Deposit Account$692.0M3%
Commissions And Brokerage Service Fees$657.0M3%
Trailing Commission$250.0M1%

Related Comparisons