vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Rafael Holdings, Inc. (RFL) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($290.0K vs $240.0K, roughly 1.2× Rafael Holdings, Inc.). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -4090.0%, a 3326.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rafael Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.5% vs -46.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Rafael Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs -35.0%).
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd. is an Israeli defense technology company. It was founded as Israel's National R&D Defense Laboratory for the development of weapons and military technology within the Israeli Ministry of Defense; in 2002 it was incorporated as a limited company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
RFL vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $240.0K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-9.8M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4225.4% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -4090.0% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 87.5% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $240.0K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.0K | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.0K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.0K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-32.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.7% | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -4225.4% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2330.3% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -27726.5% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4622.1% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | -4090.0% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2707.9% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9628.3% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8892.6% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.36 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.25 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $45.5M | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $85.2M | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $105.4M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $45.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.1M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $85.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.9M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.8M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.1M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.8M | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-251.0K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.5M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-375.0K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -111.6% | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.9% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.42× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
